logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단2407
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driven a Cran-do car without obtaining a driver’s license on January 21, 2016, and proceeded with approximately 15 km section from the front day of a two-way restaurant in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yeongdeungpo-gu, to the front day of the “E” located in the Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

2. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), shall interfere with the business of a male guest at the places indicated in paragraph 1, around 23:50, and “one male guest”.

After parking a drinking motor vehicle in front of a store, he/she shall dry a drinking fee.

Article 112 of the Act provides that “A person who is under contact with the head of the Si/Gun/Gu having a high-speed vehicle for alcohol and drinking without any contact with the head of the Si/Gun/Gu shall be required to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting approximately three minutes during the period from G 23:50 on the same day to G 0:35 on the same day, and from G 23:50 on the same day to G 45 minutes on the same day.

At the time, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as snicking, inabrupting and gling, and snicking on the face, while driving under the influence of alcohol.

there was a reasonable reason to determine the person.

Nevertheless, the defendant reported that "I have not driven a motor vehicle, and that I have failed to drive a motor vehicle," and why I have taken a drinking test.

The term "domination" means "domination, and failure to comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without good cause."

3. On January 22, 2016, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties is required to comply with drinking measurement by G from the background leading up to the Incheon Samsan Police Station, which was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports and electric contact as described in paragraph 2, at around 00:05 at the place described in paragraph 1, and as described in paragraph 2.

The above H is pushed down on the ground that “Absent H affiliated with the same police station refuses to take a drinking test,” and that he prevented the Defendant from moving in order to measure drinking.

arrow