1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) on the street before and after the police box located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around August 23:10, 201; (b) under the influence of alcohol, the police officers belonging to the above police box, who were under the influence of alcohol, requested him to return home after paying the fee; and (c) on the recommendation of returning home after having the police officers belonging to the above police box pay the fee.

B. “Identification of this fact” b. On the other hand, the police officers in the above E police box continued to go with, and enter the police box at that place “this rings, spacks, spacks, spacks, spacks, and spacks to the court.”

It is not required that there will be only within the limit of time.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance about 20 minutes, such as taking a bath.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on August 29, 2017, during the process of arresting a flagrant offender in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act at the police box around 00:02 on August 29, 2017, to the F officer of the police box affiliated with the above E, “I ambling, Chewing, and shots abnormal.”

Omission Sheet. Chewing ... Sheet, she expressed his/her bath, and assaulted the face of the F in his/her hand, such as taking the face of the F in his/her hand once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation of the official order), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crimes;

2. Aggravation of concurrent crimes prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of two crimes above shall be added];

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is committed by the Defendant at the government office.