1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds alleged in the court of first instance by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is re-

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court is that the reasoning for this case is stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments as to the plaintiff's assertion, the grounds for this Court shall be based on Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Parts]

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Rules on Disciplinary Measures against Local Public Officials, etc. apply to the instant disciplinary action against local public officials, and that the instant salary reduction disposition was unlawful as it erred by applying the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Rules on Disciplinary Measures against Local Public Officials, etc.; however, the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Rules on Disciplinary Measures against Local Public Officials, etc. also provides disciplinary measures against the “defensive to reprimand” or “other injury to dignity” as disciplinary standards against the “defensive to reprimand” and thus, the instant salary

The plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.

B. The plaintiff asserts that this case's salary reduction disposition decided by the Seoul Metropolitan Government Personnel Committee without undergoing deliberation and resolution by the Mapo-gu Personnel Committee of the Mapo-gu Office, although the case is subject to minor disciplinary action against public officials of Grade VI or below belonging to Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

According to Article 1-4 of the Local Public Officials Discipline and Appeal Regulations, it is established in the Special Metropolitan City, Metropolitan Cities, Special Self-Governing Cities, Dos and Special Self-Govern