logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011. 01. 07. 선고 2010누24953 판결
농지대토에 대한 양도소득세 감면을 받기 위한 거주 및 경작요건을 갖추지 못함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 2010Guhap468 (2010.08)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2009J3115 ( October 20, 2009)

Title

It does not meet the requirements of residence and cultivation to obtain the reduction or exemption of capital gains tax on the substitute land for farmland.

Summary

(1) Not only does it meet the requirements of residence and cultivation to obtain a reduction or exemption of capital gains tax on substitute farmland, but also did not directly cultivate farmland at the time of transfer;

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 111,040,000 for the plaintiff on July 1, 2008 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgments of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Consultations

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow