1. Revocation of the part against an obligor in the judgment of the first instance, and the motion of the obligees corresponding to the revoked part;

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is the same as that for the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The obligees (1) there is no fact that the Deceased suffered damage from the side of the G church, and the obligees are not the victims of the G church, and there is no fact that the obligees have demanded divorce or interfered with the Deceased.

(2) The reason for the suicide of the deceased is due to the collision and stress between the deceased and the persons related to the church who tried to cover sexual assault convers that had been revealed in relation to sexual assault cases between the deceased and the members of the counseling center of the deceased. Even though it is not so, the creditors submitted the reference document to the court of first instance after the closing of argument in the court of first instance to August 4, 2015, which was submitted by the creditors to the court of first instance, in relation to the reason for the suicide, "the reason for the suicide of the deceased was confirmed through relics." However, it is not known that the family council and this counseling center located in Songpa-gu Seoul, where the deceased was present, did not actually have sexual assault cases. However, it is difficult to find that the deceased was sexual assault cases and attempted to help the victim who was thought to be sexual assault victims, but did not help the victim, and it was rejected by submitting the supplementary report to the Council, and it was rejected by attaching some of the aforementioned contents."

However, since the creditors maintained the existing purport of the petition of appeal, and did not state the reference document as of August 4, 2015 at the date of pleading of this court, the purport of the petition is stated as it is in the first instance court, but the creditors asserted that the purport of the petition is changed from the trial to the annexed document attached to the reference document.