The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of suspended sentence in August, community service hours, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected his mistake, the defendant has a family member to support the defendant, and the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, each of the crimes of this case provided game products with contents different from the contents of the deliberation on the rating classification by the Game Rating Board and exchanged the results obtained through the game products. It is inevitable for a strict punishment in light of the seriousness of social harm and harm, such as encouraging a general public's spirit of gambling and undermining the will to work, etc. In light of the criminal punishment and equity for other crimes similar to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character, conduct, occupation and environment, family relationship, circumstances and results of each of the crimes of this case, and all of the circumstances constituting the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.