logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.09.19 2019고단237
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 237"

1. Around 14:10 on December 4, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.182% of blood alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, and the Defendant driven a DNA straw car at the section of about 1km from the road near the chyp in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu to the road in the front of the chyp underground car in Seoul, to the road.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in the operation of Drocketing or other automobiles.

Around 14:10 on December 4, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car while drunk without obtaining a driver’s license, and proceeded at a speed of about 30 km per hour between 6 lanes in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others depending on the traffic conditions of the road, and there was a duty of care to report the traffic conditions of the front bank well and to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to perform his duties at the front time while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license, and neglected to do so, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to perform his duties at the front time in the direction of the driving of the Defendant, thereby obtaining the part of the driver’s license in front of the car driving of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow