1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts of recognition are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 6, Gap evidence 8-1, and Gap evidence 11:

The Plaintiff is a corporation that runs the business of manufacturing electronic components and wholesale and retail business, and Defendant A A A’s certificate (Business Convention and Contract Payment Certificate) No. 6 is indicated as B’s representative C. However, Defendant A’s mother who actually operated B is the Defendant A’s mother and the party who actually operated B does not conflict between the parties, and thus, it shall

The company is a person registered as a business operator under the trade name of “B,” and the Defendant Pakistan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of electronic equipment and wholesale and retail business, and is developing and producing SPES (name PD240-DA9) from 2008.

B. On June 23, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into the instant goods supply contract with Defendant A, and the Defendant Company’s electric source supply equipment (PD240-D40-A9, hereinafter “instant product”).

(1) A contract under which 1,00 won per unit price is determined and supplied as of July 20, 201 for the payment period (hereinafter “instant commodity supply contract”) (hereinafter “instant commodity supply contract”).

(2) On June 24, 201, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 4,000,000 to Defendant A in advance pursuant to the instant goods supply contract, and Defendant A transferred the same year.

7. 20. The Plaintiff supplied 950 products of this case to the Plaintiff.

C. On the other hand, on July 4, 201, the Plaintiff was ordered to supply 1,00 products, including electric power supply equipment, and the Plaintiff manufactured and supplied products, including the instant products supplied by the Defendant A. 2) The Plaintiff supplied the products, such as ED type light, supplied by the Plaintiff, to the Hassk Electric Industries Co., Ltd. located in Japan. On August 201, 201, the Plaintiff supplied Haskmin Electric Industries Co., Ltd. with the products, such as PE type light, supplied by the Plaintiff to the Hask Electric Industries Co., Ltd. located in Japan.