logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.10.05 2017가합70727
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs the construction business, etc., and the Defendant is a corporation established under the Korea Land and Housing Corporation Act, which is an implementer of the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C Urban Development Project” located in Goyang-gu B Dong.

(A) evidence of heading 1, 2.b.

On August 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) divided the business facility site and main commercial complex site into D (area 12,568 square meters); (b) E (area 8,187 square meters); and (c) F (area 15,448 square meters); and (b) publicly announced the project proposal public offering (hereinafter “instant public offering”).

(2) The instant public notice prescribed the period from September 1, 2016 to September 2, 2016 (the time is from 10:00 to 15:00) and the period of receipt of project proposal from November 10, 2016 to 15:00, and prescribed the procedure for selecting a priority bidder and the conclusion of a contract for the sale of land.

(3) The guidelines for the public offering of project proposal attached to the instant public notice (hereinafter “instant guidelines”) contain provisions, such as “the supervision and management of the instant public offering, the measurement and evaluation of the project proposal, etc.,” and “the examination of public offering of project proposal, such as the non-measurement and evaluation of the project proposal, etc., by the Defendant’s head office (technical review group)” (Article 5(3) and “the Defendant’s head office (technical review group)” (Article 5(4)); the signs and contents of the copy of the project proposal are not allowed to identify the project applicant (proviso of Article 16(4)); and the price assessment (Articles 21 and 22) is to select the project applicant who obtained higher than the standard points by evaluating the items and non-measurement items (Article 21 and 22).

(A) Evidence 3. (c)

(1) The Plaintiff subscribed to the FF district on September 1, 2016, and the Plaintiff subscribed to H (hereinafter “H”) and I (hereinafter “I”) for the FF district.

(2) The Plaintiff is the Defendant between November 10, 201 and 15:00, within the period of receipt of the project proposal.

arrow