Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who actually operates C, a corporation that produces sanddr position panels by processing the Alympic granc glaco, etc. in B, and the victim D (D and 23 years of age) is a worker belonging to the above company.

On August 27, 2018, at around 13:25, the victim, at the above company around 13:25, had engaged in the process by putting the broadband on the Kalymcococom in the above company, after putting off the Gam on the Kamco set up above the above Gamco on the Gamco set up on the Gamco set up on the Gamco set up on the Gamco set up on the Gamco set up on the Kamco, and cutting off the Kamco set up the Kamco set up on the Kamco set up on the Kamco set up on the Gamco set.

The above work is likely to cause danger to workers' life or body by putting an anal-year gold bar plate, which is a weight of about 4ton weight, in the process of putting the anal-year gold bar board on a co-days, falling down on the floor and falling down the anal-year gold bar board into the floor. In such a case, the Defendant, who is the actual business owner of the above company, has a duty of care to prevent danger to workers by installing safety devices so as not to deviate or go out from the bar day, providing workers with sufficient safety education, etc., and to take necessary measures to prevent danger caused by defective work methods, etc. in handling the anal-year gold bar board, which is a heavy object, such as providing workers with sufficient safety education. In a place where there is a risk of decrease in material quality, he/she has a duty of care to take necessary measures to prevent danger to workers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take such measures as above, and did not install sufficient safety devices on the co-Japanese car and leleday, and without sufficiently educating the employees of the risks of the fall-out of the co-Japanese car or the above objects, the victim operated the lews by negligence in the course of business.