A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has been in general control over air tickets reservation, rights and group travel affairs while working as the chief of the general office at the victim (the victim) of E in the third floor located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from March 1999 to August 2012.

Around June 11, 2007, the Defendant requested that I director who has been in charge of managing the above underwater account send money to the H of the victim’s account in the name of “F” office, and requested I director who has been in charge of managing the above underwater account, such as the issuance of airline tickets requested from “(State)G,” and then I received the total amount of KRW 1,585,000 from I to the new bank account in the name of the victim’s name (J) and the veterinary account, and then arbitrarily used the remainder of KRW 1,530,000 for the sake of the victim’s business during the course of keeping the victim’s account for the sake of his business.

In addition, during the period from that time to August 1, 2012, the Defendant embezzled 27,105,120 won on a total of 66 occasions as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness L, and partial statement of the witness M in court;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused (including L/C)

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data on each liquidity transaction detailed statement attached to a complaint filed, the details of each period of receiving transaction, the report on materials submitted, the suspect (one-time statement), the confirmation of transfer transaction (one-time statement), the suspect explanatory material (2 times), the suspect explanatory material (2 times), and the underwater expenses claimed by A;

1. Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act by universal title to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution did not have any particular criminal record before the Defendant is indicted for the instant case, and there is a dispute over the total amount of damage deposited, and some amount of embezzlement.