logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2009.12.04 2008가합27717
임금
Text

1. The plaintiff A's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall select the rest of the plaintiffs except the plaintiff A as shown in the attached Form.

Reasons

1. We examine the legitimacy of the Plaintiff A’s lawsuit ex officio on whether the Plaintiff’s lawsuit is lawful.

Plaintiff

A claims 0 won against the Defendant under the purport of the instant claim. In such a case, the interest in the lawsuit cannot be deemed to exist, and thus, the Plaintiff’s lawsuit is unlawful.

2. Determination on the plaintiffs' claims except the plaintiff A

A. The facts of recognition (1) The defendant is an employer as a basic local government, and the plaintiffs are employed by each defendant and are employed by or retired from work as street cleaners, park managers, or commercial workers. The types of work by plaintiff are as shown in the annexed work classification by plaintiff.

(2) In 205, 2006, 2007, and 208, 15 local governments, including the Defendant, concluded each wage agreement and collective agreement in accordance with the standard of ordinary wages applied for each year from June 2005 to December 2008 under the wage agreement and collective agreement, i.e., overtime work allowances, holidays, annual leave allowances, monthly leave allowances, and retirement allowances from the Defendant respectively, and i.e., the Plaintiffs, who are commercial workers, are referred to as the “Plaintiff’s street cleaners,” and the “Plaintiff’s Park Management Institute,” when referring to the Plaintiffs, who are the Park Management Institute. (2) The Plaintiff’s 15 local governments, including the Defendant, entered the National Democratic Union Trade Union (former trade union: Gyeonggi-do trade union), to which the Plaintiff’s commercial workers belong, and the contents of the collective agreement related to each claim for overtime work allowances, overtime work allowances, additional monthly leave allowances and retirement allowances within the scope of 00 years.

(3) On the other hand, in the case of the Plaintiff street cleaners, the collective agreement concluded between the Suwon Broadcasting and the Defendant in 2005 and the collective agreement concluded in 2006, 2007, and 2008.

arrow