A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, together with the defendant, was sentenced on April 28, 2017 to the High Court 2016 High Court 7341, 8059 (Joint), 869 (Joint), 2017 High Court 626 (Joint), and C, which was prosecuted by the defendant.

On November 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud at the Incheon District Court on August 9, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 17, 2016.

The Defendant and C, and D did not intend to purchase the used cars at the end of 2016 order 8669, the Defendant and C play a role of withstanding the end of the vehicle with the intention of purchasing the used cars, and D takes a role of purchasing the used cars as if they were to purchase the used cars, and they first belong to the end of the day on which the transaction registration was made with the victim Ath Capital Co., Ltd. and the transaction registration was made with the victim, and at the same time purchase the cars to the victim.

In order to obtain the loan from the damaged party by applying for a false loan, it is intended to obtain the loan from the damaged party.

The defendant, C, and D want to purchase a H M 520 d heavy vehicles with the vehicle value of KRW 40 million through D D, which is about 520 d heavy vehicles of KRW 40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, around June 29, 2016, at the Aju 142 office of the 744-3 Trading Complex 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant, C, and D merely intended to use the above loan for other purposes, and they did not intend to actually purchase the above vehicle or to pay the installment thereof.

The Defendant, C, and D, as above, deceiving the victim and caused the victim to remit the amount of KRW 25 million to the account in the name of E on the same day, and again, E had the victim remit the amount of KRW 23 million to a new bank account in the name of D.

Accordingly, the defendant, C, and D conspired to deception the victim and deliver 23 million won to E. It has the victim receive 2 million won.