1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment by the court concerning this part of the disposition is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff is a type 1 of the Complex Madio Madio Madio Madio Madio Madio Madio Madio Madio (ISP).

Therefore, it is illegal that the defendant issued a disposition of additional injury or disease approval on the ground that the defendant failed to meet the diagnosis criteria.

(b) Attached records, such as relevant statutes;

C. (1) Medical opinions 1) The document No. 2 No. 2 written on the first upper part of evidence No. 2015, October 13, 2015 was written on the basis of the results, such as NRS inspection, trike cans, physical heat photographing, photographing, etc. conducted between July 6, 2015 and September 21, 2015.

(2) In the symptoms of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff satisfied the four criteria of total of 4 out of four categories, due to symptoms of reduction of the sensium and the skin color and change of the skin temperature, ② low stringing and skin color, ③ reduction of the flag operating frequency, physical charging, loss-top or hairing, decline of skin, or change of dystrophism, and the symptoms of the dystrophism change in the skin dystrophism. The Plaintiff also satisfies the four criteria of total of 4 out of the four categories, and even on the signs, the Plaintiff’s additional examination application constitutes the Plaintiff’s examination application form based on the results of the examination of the diagnosis of this case (the Plaintiff’s additional examination application form).