Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff on September 24, 2015 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. 이 사건 처분 원고는 2014. 11. 25. 16:30경 거제조선소 RT-ROOM 현장에서 자재 하차 작업 중 철제품이 넘어지면서 원고의 엄지손가락 끝 마디가 제품과 적재함에 끼이는 사고를 당한 뒤 ‘우측 엄지의 끝 마디뼈 골절(폐쇄성), 우측 엄지의 으깸 손상’으로 요양승인받아 2015. 6. 30.까지 요양하였다.
On September 14, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an additional injury and disease application with the Defendant on September 14, 2015, which resulted in the occurrence of a single type of multi-fluoral perjury.
On September 24, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision not to accept the said application on the ground that it falls short of the standard for diagnosis of the group of multiple copies issued with the certificate of multiple copies.
(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the evidence Nos. 4 and the result of the Defendant’s request for the examination of medical records on the Guro University Hospital at Korea University at Korea, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the criteria for the Defendant’s examination of the medical records on the medical records on the hospital at Korea University at Korea; (b) the Plaintiff has continuous pains caused by the foregoing accident; and (c) the Plaintiff appears to have at least one symptoms and at least one sign in the three categories, such as the attached examination results of the attached Form Nos. 4; and (d) the decline in the operation of the sports team at Korea is likely to be caused by the frame and the fixedness of the horse group, but all other symptoms and signs are highly likely to be caused by the combined multiple pains.
According to this, the plaintiff is deemed to meet the standard of examination in the group of multiple pain symptoms, such as at least one symptoms in three of the four categories listed in the attached Table 4 and at least one signs in at least two categories among four categories.
(EMG/NCS) even in accordance with the Defendant’s diagnosis criteria, the method of such examination is the essential category of reduction or more (e.g., an essential test after requisition) only in the case of the 2nd type of multi-complication.