1. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C Co., Ltd and the Intervenor succeeding to Defendant D is dismissed in entirety.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the children of Nonparty B, and Defendant C and D concluded an insurance contract with the network F (hereinafter “the deceased”).

The defendant succeeding intervenor is a company that received rights and obligations concerning all insurance contracts from D through a resolution of the Financial Services Commission around 2017.

B. B and the Deceased were in school from around 2014, and the G date H reported marriage on December 24, 2014 between them.

On May 209, the deceased reported the above marriage, and around May 2009, the deceased reported the recognition of the Plaintiff who gave birth between B and another male (hereinafter “the recognition report of this case”).

C. Upon repeated disputes with the Deceased, B and the Deceased were repeated, around May 12, 2015, and went back to his office. Around August 2015, B filed a divorce lawsuit against the Deceased, and on October 29, 2015, B and the Deceased were divorced as follows.

2. Designation of a person with parental authority and a custodian B;

3. He shall designate a person with parental authority and a custodian as the Deceased; and

4. B and the Deceased shall not claim monetary against the other party under any pretext, such as consolation money, division of property, child support, etc. in connection with the divorce of this case.

(b)

6. Upon completion of the divorce of this case, the Deceased shall proceed with the procedures for dissolution of the Plaintiff’s dissolution and the claim for adjudication on modification of the principal and the origin of the case, and in this regard, B shall cooperate therewith.

The mediation has been completed. D.

The Deceased died as a traffic accident on November 29, 2015 when the procedures for dissolution of the adoptive relation against the Plaintiff were not followed.

E. On December 7, 2017, the mother I filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff with the Busan Family Court for the confirmation of invalidity of the deceased's identity (2017Ddan213414). The above court's recognition report of this case on May 9, 2018 has no effect as an adoption report because it did not meet the requirements of adoption, and it is obvious that the deceased is not the birth father of the plaintiff. Thus, the recognition report of this case is null and void, and I do so.