The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes all of the crimes of this case and reflects it, the defendant committed the crime of this case for the purpose of maintaining a livelihood, and the defendant's health status is not good.

However, as long as the Defendant was sentenced to the suspended sentence for a crime of attempted special robbery in 2014, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of the suspended sentence, without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to a fine on one occasion after being sentenced to the suspended sentence for the crime of attempted robbery in 2014, and committed the instant crime again during the period of the suspended sentence; yet, the damages still have not yet been recovered; the Defendant continuously committed the instant crime after being arrested as an offender on June 29, 2016, and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, which are conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, cannot be deemed unfair because the lower court’s sentence is too excessive.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.