logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.08 2014고합29
특수공무집행방해치사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, around 16:12, 2013, driven an apartment complex 1 complex in the Eunpyeong-gu, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 595 Samsung Facc, and proceeded at a speed of about 60 km per hour at a speed of about 50 km from the surface of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is about 124 cm off from the surface of the former tunnel to the surface of the air tunnel.

At the front of the bed, the victim C(51) who is a police officer belonging to the Eunpyeong Police Station in Seoul, was under the control of traffic offense, but the defendant found that the defendant was driving a safe leb without wearing a safety mob and requested to stop the lebs by breaking the lebs from four lanes to two lanes, so in such a case, the defendant who is engaged in the lebsian driving has a duty of care to safely check the lebs well and safely prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not live well, and caused the death of the victim due to cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral eption on December 7, 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence above.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of an error under paragraph (1).

No motor vehicle owner shall operate a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant, without purchasing mandatory insurance, operated the above urbane at the date, time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Although the Defendant made a statement in the court of law confessions the part of the Defendant’s failure to perform his/her duty at the front time, the Defendant’s failure to perform his/her duty at the front time, the facts charged in the preliminary charge are factually the same as the facts charged in the primary charge, and thus denies it.

arrow