logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.08.22 2019고합91
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation, who is an applicant for compensation, KRW 12,00,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Jeonju District Court's Militarysan Branch on April 23, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the military prison on June 19, 2016.

On November 2017, the Defendant was living in Jeju-do and used money at an unsound place, and had a debt of approximately KRW 400 million including card debts, including approximately KRW 1.5 million. At the time, as to D operated by the Defendant, it was impossible to repay the above debt because it did not make any profit because it did not operate its business registration and did not make any profit. In fact, the Defendant was able to receive money from the victims as if he would have made an investment in connection with the fireworks business, etc. in the order of the victims without the intent to make an investment in the fireworks net business, etc., and was able to receive money from the victims by means of the so-called “lost” method, in which he would pay other victims a profit.

1. Violation of the Specific Economic Crimes Aggravated Punishment Act (Fraud);

A. The victim E and the victim E worked in F operated by the Defendant’s mother, and they came to know with this.

around November 2017, the Defendant deposited KRW 50,00,00 to the victim as if the Defendant used part of the investment funds received from other persons in order to deceiving the victim to pay the return on investment in advance to the victim as if the Defendant received the return on investment from the other persons in advance, while making a false statement to the victim. The Defendant deposited KRW 500,000 to the victim as if the Defendant received the return on investment from the other persons in advance to pay the return on investment in advance to the victim.

However, the defendant is operated by the defendant at that time.

arrow