The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to add the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. 이 법원에서 고쳐쓰는 부분 ▣ 제1심판결문 제2쪽 제9행의 “2016. 12. 30.”을 “2016. 12. 31.”로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 제3쪽 제6행의 “2012. 12. 26.”을 “2016. 12. 14.”로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 제3쪽 제8행의 “2016. 12. 31.”을 “2016. 12. 21.”로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 제5쪽 제1행의 “2016. 4. 21.”을 “2016. 5. 4.”로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 제7쪽 제5행 제7쪽 상단의 글상자 부분은 행으로 보지 아니한다.

The term " April 21, 2016" in the Gu shall be " May 4, 2016".

▣ 제1심판결문 제7쪽 제7행의 “2015. 4. 26.”을 “2016. 4. 26.”로 고친다.

3. The Plaintiff asserts that, as the grounds for appeal in this Court, the Plaintiff, “The Plaintiff, based on the decrease in the usage fees due to the passenger ship operation that occurred until April 26, 2016, was considered as the same as the Defendant imposed the reduction in the usage fees on the passenger ship operation that occurred after April 27, 2016, and obtained the second permission to make a disposition to reduce the usage fees in the future, and the Defendant committed a violation of the principle of protection of trust or a violation of abuse of or non-exercise of discretionary power to impose the agreed usage fees without the Defendant’s decision to reduce the usage fees against such trust.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court. The evidence submitted in the first instance court was added to the evidence submitted in this court (No. 14 and No. 15-1 through 4), and the reasons cited above and the above mentioned.