logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016. 12. 07. 선고 2016누52653 판결
주식 및 경영권을 양도함으로써 법인과 대표자 겸 주주간의 특수관계가 소멸됨[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2015-Gu Partnership-80154 ( October 15, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2014west 4390 ( October 28, 2015)

Title

The special relationship between the corporation and the representative and the shareholders is extinguished by transferring the shares and the management right.

Summary

It is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff terminated the status as a person with a special relationship with the corporation due to the transfer of shares and the transfer of management rights, and so long as it is difficult to view that the special relationship between the Plaintiff and the instant company was maintained until the merger date of the instant company, the disposition of this case where the Plaintiff imposed a comprehensive income tax for 09 years on different premise

Related statutes

Article 52 of the Corporate Tax Act: Denial of Wrongful Calculation

Article 67 of the Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2016Nu52653 Detailed income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff, Appellant

○ ○

Defendant, appellant and appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2015Guhap80154 decided June 15, 2016

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 16, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 7, 2016

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The imposition of global income tax of 000 won (including additional tax) on the Plaintiff on October 0, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow