logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고정1388
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The acquittal portion

1. At around 04:50 on April 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim E in the victim E’s second floor of the Domoel 2nd floor in Sejong, “Isle. . Haak . . . . . . . . . . Haak”; (b) expressed his desire to “Isle . . . . . . . . . .”; (c) francing the victim’s breath of her part on the part of the victim; and (d) caused damage to the existence of a multi-sex skin, which requires treatment for ten days, by taking two times the part on the part of the victim’s assault, and taking two times the part on the part.

2. In light of the above facts charged, there is a statement and a medical certificate of the victim as evidence that the defendant had damaged the victim's diversified skin requiring medical treatment for 10 days.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are as follows: ① The victim stated that he did not have been provided with medication or medication in the FF branch who issued the above medical certificate in this court, and that he was provided with her physical therapy at the hospital where her friendly Gu work together with twice. The victim suffered injury requiring 10 days' treatment, such as the above medical certificate, does not appear to have been provided with the above FF branch, and ② the victim stated that her physical therapy was not essential because she was unable to drive her body at the time, and that she stated that she was her to the extent that she was unable to drive her body at the time, and that natural therapy was possible, it is difficult to conclude that the above evidence alone caused damage to the existence of her dives that require 10 days' treatment due to the defendant's act.

Thus, the above facts charged should be pronounced not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because it constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, but it is separately ordered to dismiss the prosecution as follows with regard to the violence included in the above facts charged.

arrow