1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a doctor who operates C Hospital in Seongbuk-si (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On July 30, 2009, the Plaintiff complained of inconvenienceed to the left-hand side, and applied to the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the RoI’s inspection, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the left-hand satum satis and the revolving satis.

From that day to October 16, 2009, the Plaintiff received a preservation treatment for the soft salt, such as administration of salt in the Defendant hospital.

C. Around October 16, 2009, the Defendant recommended the Plaintiff to provide a surgical treatment for the Plaintiff’s revolving renals. On October 26, 2009, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from another hospital, and then expressed his/her intent to undergo a surgical surgery for combining renals with the renals by visiting the Defendant hospital on October 26, 2009.

On February 5, 2010, the Plaintiff received an operation to fix the revolvingr at the Defendant Hospital.

E. From February 9, 2010 to 4 days after the surgery, the Plaintiff started to conduct a dynamic colon’s exercise, external electric shock exercise, and lock-out exercise, using slots for rehabilitation treatment. Although a dynamic colon’s exercise was full-time, the radiation inspection was conducted, and as a result, the radiation inspection was conducted on August 27, 2010, and was conducted by Nonparty D and the Defendant on August 27, 2010.

H. The plaintiff now appeals to the left-hand worgsium, and there is a physical disability on the left-hand worgs.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including each number), the result of the physical examination commissioned to the head of the Seoul Hospital Hospital at the 1,000 Seoul Hospital at this court, the result of the entrustment of medical examination to the head of the Korean Medical Association, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s negligence on the first medical examination and treatment shows that the Plaintiff was in an inappropriate state to receive a revolving revolving revolving revolving the year of 74 years of age as of February 2010, and that the Plaintiff was forced to perform revolving the left-hand revolving revolving the revolving.