1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the D Hospital in Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On April 9, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and discharged the Defendant Hospital upon receiving hospitalized treatment until the 21st day of the same month, for instance, with the frame of internal walls, gymnasium, gymnasium, brain-proof sugar, and tensions in the brush.

C. On April 28, 2019, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on the following day on the ground that the Plaintiff’s shoulder pain aggravated due to the foregoing accident, and that the Defendant Hospital provided that the Defendant Hospital would be subject to the right-hand check-type and re-satisfing-type therapy, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery”) D.

However, on May 20, 2014, at the bottom of the above shoulder surgery, there was a scambane, and the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital performed cambling and scambling, performed cambling and scambling, and administered opSA (SA scambomic scambomic scambomic scambomic scambomic scambomic scams, and as a result of the inspection of the above scambomic scambomic s

E. On June 9, 2014, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on the part of its past observation and received medical treatment thereafter.

F. The result of continuous antibiotic medication with the Plaintiff was restored to the CRP within the normal range of 0.2 square meters on June 28, 2014.

(g) In total, the Plaintiff received the above treatment (hereinafter “the instant medical treatment”). However, the Plaintiff’s condition reagravated, and thereafter, received medical treatment at a nearby university hospital, but eventually, there was an obstacle due to the Plaintiff’s involuntary demotion.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7; Eul evidence Nos. 1-3; Eul evidence Nos. 1-3; and the purport of the whole pleadings was asserted by the plaintiff at the defendant hospital. After receiving the operation and treatment of the instant case at the defendant hospital, the plaintiff was found to have detected MSSA germs (in-resistant antibiotics), and then the plaintiff was found.

As above, antibiotics.