The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was put on the opposite wall to which there is no person who has the balance of the liquor branch and the police officer F, and the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the summary of the lower court’s judgment were as follows: “Around 02:40 on May 14, 2016, the Defendant was convicted of the Defendant, based on the evidence indicated in its reasoning, on the following grounds: “The Defendant was a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of the 112 Report, who was demanded from the Chief F of the Police Station E box called out by the Jinhae Police Station E box, to send the Defendant’s mother to his home. Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of the 112 Report.”

B. The following circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, ① the victim police officer F made a statement at an investigative agency that “I want to take a bath, and did an act that I tried to keep the walk in the walk in the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the calth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the w.