The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is erroneous in the misapprehension of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts for the following reasons (the defendant's defense counsel added to the defendant's defense counsel's assertion that sentencing was unfair in the summary of his/her oral argument on October 25, 2018, which was submitted to the court below. However, this cannot be deemed a legitimate ground for appeal as it was newly raised after the lapse of the period for submitting the appeal, which cannot be deemed a legitimate ground for appeal).

Accordingly, the Defendant prepared a contract agreement, etc. on the “new construction works for the EM in Incheon Si-Gun, Incheon, with the seal of G (ju), so the Defendant forged or displayed a private document under the name of G (ju).

shall not be deemed to exist.

B. The contract entered into by the Defendant in the name of G (State) with respect to “the Multi-household Construction Work for the Incheon Si-Si-Si Incheon Si-Si Incheon-si E Multi-household Construction Work” is valid, but the above contract was not implemented due to the circumstances of the owner, etc.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Determination

A. Summary of the facts charged in this case

1. Forging a private document;

A. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant who forged a standard contract for private construction works on September 2, 2016: “1. Public mission: Multi-household construction works in Incheon Si-Gun E-Gun, Incheon, in the column for construction content in three copies of the standard contract for private construction works at an office operated by D located in Incheon Si-Gun, Incheon, on September 2, 2016;

2. The construction site: F by the Incheon Si-Gun;

3. Construction period: The period of construction shall commence October 2016, completed March 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “midstanding”), and the contractor’s column, stating that “company name: G, representative: H, and contact number: Vice President A” and kept in custody next to the name of the said H.

G's painting was arbitrarily stamped.

The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.