logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단1955
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Reference Facts] On June 2016, the Defendant, a person operating B, entered into a contract with the owner D for construction of neighborhood living facilities in order to build a new living facilities in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and one parcel. The above Corporation, via the Defendant, had the owner (Joint) E and (State) F.

After October 2016, D transferred the status of the owner of the above real estate and building to G around October 2016, the defendant entered into a contract with G on November 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. As of December 21, 2016, forgery and event of “standard contract for private construction works” (amended)

A. On December 21, 2016, the Defendant was engaged in as if he was the owner G’s agent at the office (Joint) E located in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and the contractor (Joint) E’s regular director of the contractor (Joint) E, using a computer, puts a seal of G prepared in advance to the name of G in the name of G in the name of the project owner. The contractor (Joint) E’s regular director of the contractor “public mission: the construction of a daily life, the construction site, the construction site: the contract amount: the Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu: the daily sum of KRW 1,200,00,000, and the name of the contractor: G: the contract amount of a standard construction work (amended).

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a single copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and duties.

B. In the same place, the Defendant, who was aware of the forgery, exercised the forged “Standard Contract for Private Construction Works” as if the contract was duly formed.

2. As of December 29, 2016, the term “standard contract for private construction works (the second revised contract)” forged and events

A. On December 29, 2016, the Defendant was engaged in as if he were the owner G’s agent at the above (Joint) E Office, and the contractor (Joint) E’s regular director uses a computer to change the contractor’s “public mission: Construction of a new living project, construction site, construction site: Heung-gu C, J, contract amount: 1,200,000 won per day (Won 1,200,000,000).

arrow