The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is only the victim F and E at the time of the instant case, and there was no fact that the victim F were assaulted by the victim E, and there was no price on the bridge of the victim G by taking breath or exposing the chair.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below (hereinafter referred to as "each evidence of this case"), namely, ① all victims F, G, and E, who fights with the police, assaulted the victim F, E, and the Defendant in a way that the Defendant was sealed the victim F, E, and the Defendant. Each statement is consistent with the F's statement to the effect that the victim F, E, and the Defendant was detained on the victim G's bridge because they are faced with the victim's G bridge. ② According to F's body photographs, the victim F, was found to have been faced with the upper part of the bridge. According to G's upper part photographs, according to the fact that the victim F, who was faced with the victim's fighting and the Defendant's fighting, the fact that the victim's fighting and the Defendant's fighting and the Defendant's fighting were also acknowledged, but the Defendant's fighting and the Defendant's fighting were also found in the victim's own fighting and the Defendant's fighting.

In addition, considering the background of the instant crime, the aspects and degree of the instant fighting, the method and degree of the Defendant’s harmful act, damage situations, etc. recognized by each evidence of this case.