logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.02.03 2016고단1933
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 17:20 on October 16, 2016, the Defendant: (b) prevented the Defendant from entering the said restaurant due to the following reasons: (c) on the D cafeteria operated by the Victim C (A, 54 years old); (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant: (e) the Victim C (A) did not sit in one’s side; (e) the Victim C; and (e) the Victim was able to take a walk for about 20 minutes; and (e) the Victim was able to take a bath on the side; and (e) the Victim was able to take a part in the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the victimized person.

2. On October 16, 2016, at around 19:00, the injured Defendant, without any justifiable reason, went off the face of the victim E (62 tax) who was standing in front of the D cafeteria as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article by drinking the face of the victim E (62 tax). On the other hand, the Defendant continued to put the victim’s neck over the floor up on both hand and again took the victim’s face by drinking the victim’s face again, and sustained the victim’s face by drinking the victim for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (the fact that there is a history of punishment for the same type of crime, and the degree of damage is not good in light of the degree of damage, but the victims have agreed with the victims that they are not subject to punishment for the accused, and they are against the accused;

(2) The decision is delivered with the order for the reasons above.

arrow