A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 20, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the restaurant by force by force of the victim, such as: (a) under the influence of alcohol on the “E restaurant” operated by the victim D (Inn, 60 years of age) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) prior to being fined upon the victim’s report, the Defendant scamed the table while drinking the victim; and (c) putting the table on the table, shacking the bed and the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed on the table; and (d) breaking the bed and the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed on the table; and (b) harming the restaurant’s operation of the restaurant by force.

2. On July 2014, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol at “E restaurant” as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant: (b) took a bath for male customers who had drinking alcohol on the table table, without any justifiable reason, and (c) took a beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, on the front glass of the restaurant following the customer; and (d) destroyed the victim’s market price at approximately KRW 100,000 of the market price owned by the victim D, thereby impairing its utility.

3. On November 6, 2016, around 19:55, the Defendant: (a) took a bath without any justifiable reason to the Victim FF (65 years) who had drinking alcoholic beverages on the side table table, while drinking alcoholic beverages in the “E cafeteria”; (b) the victim neglected it and attempted to go out of the restaurant, and (c) the victim’s injury exceeded the congested floor, thereby putting the victim over the confluence of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D or F;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs and damaged photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business), Article 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation shall be the general injury (the scope of recommended punishment).