logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.10.16 2015고단1057
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to acquire money by fraud by using false words as expenses for using Cheongburg funds by coloring persons among the surrounding people.

Defendant

A around December 2008, around 2008, the victim G, which he had been aware of as real estate-related duties in Egypt, in front of the Egypt, Daegu Northern-dong, Y, stated that “The President of H has any funds hidden in B B and B, but I was not able to make a simple writing, and the President of J is working under the water foundation to use this money. There is a person who arranges B, among the domestic and foreign relatives, the NIS Director of the NIS, and there is a number of billions upon completion of the work. In addition, if he lends 40 million won or 50 million won at the work’s expense, he would make the last 250 million won.”

After that, around August 13, 2009, the Defendants met the L Office located in Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with the victim and the victim transferred to the former owner, and Defendant B plays the role of the chief office to find about about about five trillion won of the former president who was concealed in the B B B B B, and to find out about five trillion won of the non-funds of the former president who was concealed in the B, B, and the amount of the non-funds is needed to find the funds.

However, it was not true that the Defendants did not find out the funds of the former president, and the Defendants did not have any specific occupation or property, so even if they borrowed money from the victims, they did not have any intent or ability to complete payment.

The Defendants conspired to deception the victim as above and received 32.5 million won from the victim’s occupation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each police statement of G and M;

1. The text messages of each A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on notarial deeds;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow