logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.6.13.선고 2019도4718 판결
절도
Cases

2019Do4718 thief

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm Iln, Attorney Kim Jong-soo

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2018Do3547 Decided April 10, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

June 13, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal doctrine and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on admissibility of evidence or intent to illegally obtain in larceny.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Kim Jae-hyung

Justices Cho Jong-hee

Justices Min Min-young

Justices Lee In-bok and Lee Dong-won

arrow