The defendant shall be innocent.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2012. 8. 26. 22:25경 서울 강북구 C 앞 D 버스정류장 부근에서 피해자 E(59세)이 운전하는 F 소속의 G 시내버스에 강아지를 안고 승차하였다는 이유로 피해자가 버스에서 내리라고 하자 화가 나 “이 개새끼들, G 회사 새끼들”이라고 욕을 하고 지갑을 쥔 손으로 운전석에 앉아있는 피해자의 머리를 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. 피고인 및 변호인 주장의 요지 피고인은 피해자와 시비 중 피해자의 머리를 ‘툭’ 친 사실은 있으나, 당시 피해자는 피고인에게 버스에서 내리라고 요구하며 정차 중이었으므로 ‘운행 중’일 것을 요건으로 하는 특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)죄가 성립하지 아니한다.

3. The burden of proving the criminal facts and the degree of such burden of proving the criminal facts prosecuted in the criminal trial must be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected to be guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Do5662 delivered on December 24, 2002). According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the defendant was able to get on a bus with a strong view to the following facts: (a) the defendant was trying to get on the bus, and part of the body was kid between the bus and the bus crepan in order to rapidly close the bus door from the beginning; (b) the defendant was able to get on the bus and pay the bus fee and to sit on the seat; and (c) the defendant was able to get off the bus by getting on the bus and pay the bus fee; and (d) the victim was able to get off the bus.