Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 30, 2016, the Defendant intrusiond the victim’s residence in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and around 19:40 on January 30, 2016, the Defendant visited the customer and intruded the victim’s residence using an open cre in front of 103 1303 dong 1303.

2. The defendant shall open a thief and open a door, and take out one abstract of the resident registration card and one copy of the divorce report, where the market price owned by the injured party is unknown at the time of thief’s opening and keeping in the margin;

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Data on photographs, such as site;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Abstract of resident registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of divorce declarations;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On March 2007, the Defendant made a divorce agreement with D around March 2007, but decided to maintain de facto marriage without notifying his/her children of divorce until he/she reaches 20 years of age.

During that period, the Defendant was a director of the apartment complex in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who was already living in, caused by the water leakage of the upper floor of the apartment, and was a new apartment to enable his children to live in a pleasant environment. However, there is no money in D, and the Defendant did not prepare for directors. In order to pressure D, the Defendant entered a private teaching institute at night and entered a low house, and the Defendant’s excessive termination of the lawsuit was made. Around September 2014, 201, the Defendant was a director of the instant apartment complex, and the Defendant was a director of the instant apartment.