logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2019.07.25 2019고정59
출입국관리법위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant A is the representative of the corporation Eul, who is in C at the time of his racing, who exercises overall control over the above business.

When a foreigner intends to work in the Republic of Korea, he shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities under the conditions as prescribed by the Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ a foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, between January 15, 2018 and February 27, 2018, the Defendant employed 9 foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment as shown in the separate sheet of crime between November 2, 2017 and March 3, 2018, including employment of D (E) of the nationality of Thailand who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment, as described in the separate sheet of crime.

2. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing motor vehicle parts.

The defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1), committed the same violation as the above paragraph (1) by a representative of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of F or G;

1. Investigation report (related to ascertaining data on entry into and departure from Korea for the defendant), - Long-term and long-term stay records, entry into or departure records, and registered alien records

1. An investigation report (verification of the status of the foreigner not employed for the defendant - The list of crimes and attached Table 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation of immigration offenders;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act (Selection of Fines);

(b) Defendant B: Subparagraph 2 of Article 99-3 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 18(3) of the same Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The confession of the Defendant under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the first offense, and the first offense.

arrow