1. The Defendant: (a) from February 24, 2015, with respect to Plaintiff A’s KRW 16,766,840; (b) KRW 16,44,740; and (c) each of the above amounts.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Details of the public works - The name of the project: the project implementer: the project implementer: the Seoul Northern Expressway Corporation (the defendant's agency for the business management and the compensation for site): the public notice on June 5, 2012; No. 2012-284, Jun. 5, 2012;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”) dated 23, 2014 - The date of expropriation: On December 16, 2014, the land subject to expropriation: The land subject to expropriation is calculated based on the arithmetic average of the values of appraisal results of the appraisal evaluation corporation and the F Appraisal Corporation, which are owned by the Plaintiff, for two parcels of land and C, not less than 330 square meters (hereinafter “C land”), and two lots of land owned by the Plaintiff, for 81 square meters in Seoul and Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “E land”), for a road of 4 square meters in Seoul (hereinafter “E”), for a road of 296 square meters in size (hereinafter “F land”), and for F land – the compensation for losses for the Plaintiffs based on the arithmetic average of the values of appraisal results of the appraisal results of the appraisal corporation and F Appraisal Corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal made an objection (hereinafter “Objection”) on January 22, 2015 - Compensation for losses: Based on the arithmetic average of the results of each appraisal by the national appraisal corporation and the foreign appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively “appraisals”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Objection”) respectively, the Central Land Tribunal shall calculate the amount of compensation as stated in the column for “the amount of indemnity” in attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “the grounds for recognition”) for each of the above lands and obstacles owned by the Plaintiffs, as stated in the column for “the amount of indemnity” (hereinafter referred to as “the amount of indemnity”) with respect to each of the above lands and obstacles, E land, F land, and obstacles to F land (hereinafter referred to as “the amount of indemnity”) [the grounds for recognition]] without any dispute, each statement in subparagraphs 1 through 4, evidence 1 through 3, and evidence 1 through 3 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion of objection is assessed unfairly undermining the land C owned by the plaintiff, E land owned by the plaintiff, F land, and F land obstacles. Among the obstacles to the land C, some of the obstacles ( concrete ma, fences, and retaining walls) and F land are assessed.