A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:50 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant: “Around 23:50, while drinking alcohol on the floor B and 1st floor, the Defendant: (a) reported at 112, and requested that the slope D belonging to the Seocheon History Police Station C District, which was dispatched to the site, be able to be able to do so; (b) stated that “the Defendant “the Defendant shall do so” as “the head of the Seocheon History Police Station C District, which was sent to the site, was able to do so.” At the same time, the Defendant kidddddd the bridge of the said D, which was spathdd by the flag, the flag, and the flag of the flab.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. A copy of the working log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of violence victim photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of damage by police officers, the health status of the accused, the fact that it appears to be a contingent crime in flight, and the fact that it has no same kind

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;