A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2015, at around 03:10 on June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul, and (b) was able to invite a policeman affiliated with the Seoul Yongsan Police Station C District, who was called out after receiving a report of 112, to return home, and (c) the Defendant was able to walk home with the Defendant’s oral belief once again; and (d) he was able to walk home with the Defendant at the same time as he was able to buy home again; and (d) he was able to walk home with the Defendant’s oral message twice as he was shot.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to reporting 12 cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the degree of damage by police officers, the health status of the accused, the fact that the person appears to be a contingent crime in flight, and the first offender);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;