logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.08.22 2013고단1001
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A As to the crime of the second and fourth provisional crimes, the first, third, and fourth B of the judgment shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act in the Seo-gu District Court's branch branch on September 8, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 18, 201.

Defendant

A is a person who actually acts on behalf of, and receives money as a fee, such as preparing and submitting various documents by participating in the auction process of the court in 105 and 111, in the Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and the defendant B was the owner of the F apartment G in Gyeongsan-si and H neighboring housing.

1. Although Defendant A, who is not an attorney-at-law, is unable to perform legal affairs, such as representation, with respect to legal cases, such as non-contentious cases, by receiving money and other valuables, the Defendant was not an attorney-at-law, and the Defendant, on January 10, 2013, conducted an analysis of the right to the said auction real estate on behalf of the client for the auction case by the Cheongju District Court of Cheongju Branch of Cheongju Branch of Cheongju District on behalf of the client, and received KRW 1 million from the above K as a commission fee, and received KRW 17.6 million on behalf of the requester for non-contentious cases from August 9, 2013.

2. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and B;

A. Defendant B engaged in the same business on the condition that “L screen golf” was divided into M and half of its profits from the first floor of the G and H neighboring residential premises in the Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si, and H. The above M merely invested the construction cost of KRW 130 million in the interior of the above real estate due to the status of the partner, and the above M did not have a claim against the above B. The above M was a lessee of the above real estate or did not actually possess possession of the said real estate.

The Defendants, together with the aforementioned Defendants, filed an application for auction on the said B-owned real estate by the Gyeongsan Agricultural Cooperative, a creditor of the said Gyeongsan-si G and H neighboring housing, and the commencement of voluntary auction by the Daegu District Court. On August 25, 201, the Defendants were to take place.

arrow