In the criminal facts of 14. The defendant is sentenced to 2 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of 1 to 4 times in the sight list of crimes.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Sungdong detention center on July 25, 201.

[2015 Highest 3781]

1. On October 20, 201, the Defendant may allow the victim D to obtain a loan of KRW 480 million from a bank branch office in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul to obtain a start-up fund through financial operations, even if the Plaintiff’s credit status is not good.

In order to obtain a loan, the guarantor must be required to do so, and the cost of the loan amounting to KRW 13 million and the false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to receive the loan even if he received the money from the injured party, because he thought that he would use the money from the injured party as personal debt or living expenses.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being delivered KRW 3 million from the victim on October 21, 201, was delivered on the same day to the victim on October 21, 201, and all up to December 2 of the same year were delivered KRW 28 million in total on nine occasions as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes from around that time to around December 2, 201.

[2015 Highest 4245]

2. On August 2012, the Defendant prepared a false disbursement resolution in relation to the establishment of the F Foundation convalescent Hospital with the victim E at a Buddhist land on August 2012, the Defendant prepared a false disbursement resolution, and “for business, there is a need to appoint a guarantor and other service expenses.”

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the injured party, he only intended to use the money for personal purposes such as living expenses, and did not have any intention or ability to use the money for expenses related to the business.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a total of KRW 16,070,000 from the injured party over 11 times in total as shown in attached Table 2 of the List of Offenses, under the pretext of business expenses, etc.

[2016 order 218]

3. The criminal defendant against the victim G is guilty.