Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) cut off 1,00 Scenic area, the market price of which is equivalent to 10,000 won owned by the injured party C (SAMFE) from the 781 (SAMFE) Goak-gu, Changwon-si; (b) cut off 1,00,00, the market price of which is equivalent to 20,000 won owned by other injured party D (673) at the same place.

2. From January 12, 2018 around 17:00 to around 10:00 of the same month, the Defendant, from around 14, 14, 2018, 781, based on the Chang-si Chang-si Chang-si, Sungwon Senior Welfare Center for the Aged of the Aged of the Aged of the Aged of the Republic of Korea, who was attached to the table 781 (Sari-dong), destroyed a car 1, 100-day carcule in a carcule, the market price of which is equivalent to 160,000 won, belonging to the victim E (65 years).

As a result, the Defendant stolen a total of KRW 190,000 on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D, C, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (in cases of attaching photographs, etc. containing shoess), each investigation report (in cases of attaching photographs of damaged articles, and verifying damaged articles);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant has committed the same kind of crime repeatedly over several occasions; and (b) the case is not easy.

Furthermore, the defendant has already committed a second offense without being aware of having been sentenced to suspension of indictment for the same kind of crime.

However, the defendant reflects his fault in depth.

It seems that the degree of damage is not severe and the damage is returned to the victims through investigation agencies.

For a long time, a fine of small amount has been imposed on another crime, and there have been no criminal records of the same kind or of the suspension of execution.

The age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances of the crime of the defendant.