logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.12.26 2012고합1245
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,500,00 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seobu branch of the Daegu District Court on November 6, 2008, and the said summary order became final and conclusive on November 19, 2008. On June 21, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seobu branch of the Daegu District Court’s Seo-gu District Court on July 2, 201, which became final and conclusive on July 2, 201, without a driver’s license on October 5, 205:10 without a car driving license on October 5, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, reports on the detection of drinking drivers, and reports on the circumstantial statements of drinking drivers;

1. Copies of the car driving license register;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports, such as criminal records, pre-dispositions, and reporting on results of confirmation, prosecutor's investigation reports (a copy of summary order attached), and copies of each summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed for a violation of the Road Traffic Act heavier than that of a punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow