logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.12.11 2012고단2299
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and by a fine of thirty-eight thousand won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as the Director D (D) from December 1, 2006 to August 8, 201, and took charge of overall duties regarding the inspector, such as directing and supervising construction machinery inspectors.

E was designated by the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs to conduct a regular inspection of construction machinery on behalf of the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on 198, and F is a person who manages all the maintenance of construction machinery and the overall work of G related to the maintenance of construction machinery.

The owner of construction machinery shall undergo a regular inspection in E in accordance with the related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Construction Machinery Management Act, but the owner of the construction machinery shall be exempted from the inspection of the above brake system on the face of the week after issuing a certificate to the owner of the construction machinery after inspecting the brake system maintenance system of the construction machinery to be inspected by E. However, F's G has been exempted from the inspection of the brake system during the regular inspection of the construction machinery.

From the end of January 2008, the Defendant received 460,000 won in return for the convenience of periodic inspection, etc. of construction machinery from F in the vicinity of Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju in return for the convenience of regular inspection, etc. of construction machinery from F, and received a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties after being issued a total of 2,488,00 won over 42 occasions from around that time to June 201, as shown in the crime

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning F;

1. The second prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (reports attached to details of maintenance of brakes submitted to the D), investigation report (reports attached to details of transactions of accounts presented at the time of interrogation of a suspect A four times);

1. The punishment of imprisonment with labor under Article 129(1) of the Criminal Act is selected by virtue of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, but the aggravated punishment, etc. of specific crimes.

arrow