Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A for two years, and Defendant B for two years.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was operated by the second floor of the building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant B was an employee who had been engaged in the management and exchange of the store in the above respondent.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, from March 2015 to April 16, 2015, the Defendants conspired to build seven computers at the above scam room, installed a game software site (E) for each computer, such as a scam, scam, and scam, and then received cash from a large number of customers with no knowledge of the name of the above scam room from the above scam room, and made the above customers access the above scam site (E) with the ID and password managed by the store, and let the above customers charge the above scam and play the game, and then exchange the game money acquired through the use of the above scam with cash in cash by converting the game money into one won per unit.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the results of oil-free type obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutorial statement against the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement;

1. On-site photographs and copies of books;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting a crime (generality);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation: The reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry appears to be the attitude of the Defendants to recognize and reflect the facts of the crime, and the motive and background of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the record of the crime.