logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.01.16 2018고단5271
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one who provides game products with the contents different from those of the rating shall provide such game products for the distribution or use, or display or keep them for such purposes;

Nevertheless, the defendant from February 15, 2018 to the same year.

3. By the end of October, 200, the “CPC” located in the Sung-gun, Ho-do, and the game was installed in the PC, such as D and E, and only one account per capita through real name certification and cellular phone by the Game Management Committee, and was rated by the Game Management Committee for the game to be used by purchasing game money within the limit of KRW 300,000 per month after creating only one account per capita through real name certification and cellular phone. However, unlike the classified contents, the game was used by the manager-only PC and smartphone to create ID without self-certification and charge more than KRW 30,000 per capita with game money.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classification.

2. No one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products with the result of a game product.

Nevertheless, the Defendant provided customers with game products, such as D and E, at the date, time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1), and exchanged the said amount by granting cash after limiting 10% fees from the game score or remitting the said amount to account transfer, upon the request of customers to exchange game money acquired through the use of the game product.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Support for investigation reports (limited to attachment of a letter of results of support by the Game Rating and Administration Committee) and control;

arrow