A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who was divingd on June 24, 2015 at the front of the “D” drinking house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul on June 24, 2015, received a report and received a request from the victim F who is a public official belonging to the police station E box of Seodaemun-gu Police Station, to return home from the victim F, who was the police officer belonging to the police station of Seodaemun-gu Police Station, and three persons who had passed the above restaurant business operator, and the police officers who heard the victim, “I are kis, four police officers,” and

In accordance with the principle of Chewing police, this state publicly insultingd the victim by openly insultingly obscing the so-called “the Republic of Korea shall comply with this State”.

2. On the same day, the Defendant, like paragraph 1 of the same day, insulting the above F and arrested him as a flagrant offender under the above F, took a bath to the above F, and took the face of the F once a week, and took the face of the F one time to stop, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest, etc. of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to the statement of a wooden shot person and CCTV verification);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The act of the Defendant’s act of openly insulting and assaulting a police officer on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the favorable circumstances referred to as “the grounds for sentencing”), by which the Defendant wears his uniform and properly performing official duties, is deemed to be heavy in the nature of the crime.

I would like to say.

However, there are various factors for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, considering the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided in depth, the fact that there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime is favorable.