logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.04.30 2014가합21097
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the Plaintiff is a corporation that operates the manufacturing, installation, and construction business of environmental facilities, and Defendant A and B operate the manufacturing business of other electronic parts with the trade name “E”.

Defendant C operates the respective authorized brokerage business under the trade name of “F Licensed Real Estate Agent”, and Defendant D operates the respective authorized brokerage business under the trade name of “G Licensed Real Estate Agent”.

B. Defendant A and B’s ownership and permission of the instant land

(2) The instant land was registered as 9900 square meters in the title section of Gyeonggi-do under the previous title section. However, due to the change of the administrative district name, the instant land was changed to 9829 square meters in the Hasung-gun, Seosung-si on September 29, 201. On April 1, 2013, the instant land was divided into 9,256 square meters in the same Ri, 339 square meters in L, forest, and 57 square meters in M, forest. Each 6,595/900 shares, 3,305/90 shares, 900 shares, and 2) Defendant A and B acquired factory construction approval in the name of “E” with respect to the instant land that was a medical facility site, and the instant land was subject to the new construction project on May 27, 2010, and the construction permission was notified on May 27, 2010 (I).

C. On August 16, 2012, the Plaintiff and Defendant A and B agreed to purchase the instant land from Defendant A and B in KRW 2,675,000,000, and to pay the down payment of KRW 270,000,000 on the day of the contract, and the down payment of KRW 2,405,00,000 each on September 16, 2012 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

(2) On September 12, 2012, the Plaintiff paid the down payment to Defendant A and B on the date of the instant contract. At the time of the instant contract, the J, as Defendant D’s omission, assisted the Plaintiff on behalf of the Defendant D, and the Defendant C acted as the broker for Defendant A and B. (2) On September 12, 2012.

arrow