Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 20, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around April 20, 2010, the victim C’s Do party-run Chapter D of the Victim C’s Operation, which was located in B, on April 20, 2010; and (b) the Defendant had a debt equivalent to KRW 40 million for the Defendant to take over the 88 Highway expansion construction or to take part in the said construction; and (c) even if the Defendant did not have any other property and borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the said debt; and (d) even if the Defendant did not purchase a heavy so so and bought the 88 Highway expansion construction, he would be punished by more than KRW 8 million per month, and even if he paid the 88 Highway extension construction, he would have to repay the principal and the principal with the loan of KRW 30 million,000,000 on the same day.”
2. On June 14, 2010, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant did not put the cherf to the 88 Expressway Expansion Works; (b) even if he/she borrowed money from the victim C even though he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, the Defendant called “the important parts of the cherf to the 88 Expressway Expansion Works” and called “the cherf shall be immediately replaced because the cherf is unable to do so due to the sudden breakdown; and (c) the cost of the cherf shall be approximately KRW 10 million if he/she lent the cherf to the 38 Expressway Expansion Works; and (d) the Defendant was transferred from the victim KRW 10 million on the same day.”
3. On July 7, 2010, the Defendant, at the time of the July 7, 2010, received from the victim KRW 20 million on the same day on the same day, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, even though having borrowed money from the victim C, did not have the intent or ability to repay the money; (b) the victim did not have the intent or ability to remove the money; and (c) the Defendant, “I would pay a large amount of money to the money borrowed first, if the expenses are insufficient.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the accused;
1. The second time protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant;