A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 21, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E from the D head office operated by the Defendant in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, stating that “Isle-gu sold the house in Songpa-gu to KRW 1 billion and borrowed KRW 200 million. If Isle-gu lend KRW 5 million, Isle-gu interest shall be given monthly, and Isle-gu shall be paid immediately after Isle-gu receive money from women’s relatives.”

However, the facts are that the Defendant did not borrow KRW 200 million from the above female-friendly Gu, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to economic difficulties such as having a debt of approximately KRW 37 million, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim to the one bank account in the name of F.

2. On April 1, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the above D head office stating that “A deposit of KRW 10 million shall be raised to the owner of the family head office building. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million, he/she shall pay monthly interest of KRW 3,000,000, and on May 26, 2010, he/she would repay money to the Defendant at once from female-gu to the first police officer on June 2010.”

However, the facts are that the Defendant did not borrow KRW 200 million from the above female-friendly Gu, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to economic difficulties such as having a debt of approximately KRW 37 million, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim to the one bank account in the name of F.

3. Around April 6, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G through E from the above D head office, stating, “If the Defendant lends KRW 10 million to the victim G, monthly interest shall be KRW 200,000,000 per month, and he/she shall receive money from women’s relatives and shall pay it after two months.”

However, the facts are that the Defendant did not borrow KRW 200 million from the above female-friendly Gu, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to economic difficulties such as having a debt of approximately KRW 37 million, it shall be repaid.