Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

As E has been developed in the Young-si, Young-si and Young-si, the Gyeonggi-do Urban Corporation provided the owner of the land with a land for livelihood countermeasures and established (F)F, (P)G, and (P) H3 corporations for the purpose of real estate development and sale, and (P)F is the same owner of the land as the owner of the land, and (P) H is the owner of the land, who is a corporation for the purpose of real estate development and sale. (P)F is the owner of the land and the owner of the land for the purpose of the real estate development and sale. (P) H is the owner of the land for the construction and sale of the building in the Young-si, the

Defendant

A around April 12, 2016, as the representative liquidator of (ju)G, and as the representative liquidator of (ju) and (ju) H, Defendant B was appointed as the representative liquidator of (ju) H on March 31, 2017; Defendant C was appointed as the representative liquidator of (ju) F on March 31, 2017; Defendant C was appointed as the liquidator of (ju)F and (ju) H on March 31, 2017; Defendant D was appointed as the representative liquidator of (ju)F on April 12, 2016; Defendant D was appointed as the representative liquidator of (ju) on March 31, 2017; and Defendant D was appointed as the representative liquidator on March 31, 2017; the Defendants used the same office as the representative liquidator of (ju and (ju) H on March 31, 2017; and the Defendants decided to liquidate the said three companies through consultation.

1. On May 30, 2016, the Defendants: (a) held a general meeting of shareholders in the K Building in the Suwon-si District District in order to calculate the amount of KRW 2,225,00 per share as part of the liquidation procedures of the said corporations; and (b) decided that the said corporations take over the entire shares from the shareholders of 49 shareholders; and (c) accordingly, the Defendants concluded a stock transfer contract with the shareholders, as the officers of the said corporations were assigned to take over

Nevertheless, the Defendants violated their duties, and the 40 shareholders pay the full amount of the transfer price as stipulated in the above resolution and take over all shares, and shareholders, such as L, etc., who are favorable to the Defendants do not pay only the down payment and the intermediate payment out of the transfer price, and did not pay any balance of KRW 28,00,000.